Barton Biggs is always an illuminating read. If he does not always inflate your bank accounts, at least you get away feeling spiritually enriched, if not relieved.
"If investing were only about history, all the historians would be rich." How about novelists and poets like Barton?
Don't run with the herd—ever.
By Barton Biggs | NEWSWEEK
Published Dec 12, 2009
From the magazine issue dated Dec 21, 2009
There are two mighty pillars of conventional wisdom that dominate the investment universe right now. The first is that the world's asset markets are insane and dangerously bubble-prone. The second is that the global economy is doomed to Pimco CEO Bill Gross's vision of a "new normal" of economic stagnation. This overwhelming consensus, this massive groupthink, arouses an instinctive reflex reaction in a contrarian like yours truly. The herd, we contrarians maintain, whether it is made up of wildebeests or investors, is almost always wrong. Keynes said it best: "The central principle of investment is to go contrary to the general opinion." When the crowd sagely nods its head when you pontificate about where the world is going, that warm sense of confidence you get is invariably the body temperature at the center of the herd as it thunders toward a cliff.
As everyone now knows, the world has become bubble- prone because Alan Greenspan and his acolyte Ben Bernanke are the greatest bubble blowers of all time. Green-span, after getting his head handed to him with a premature "irrational exuberance" call, ordained that it was not the job of central banks to pop bubbles. Now manic speculators rule the financial markets, and volatility and madness are the order of the day. Hedge-fund managers sit around salivating for the next bubble to sell short. They are convinced the two big bubbles swollen with highly flammable gas are emerging-market equities (particularly Chinese shares) and U.S. Treasury bonds. My guess is that they are several years early on both, and being early is the same as being wrong.
The prudent contrarian has to consider alternative outlooks. First, because everyone is so focused on bubbles, this obsession makes it much more difficult to inflate a big one. Emerging-market equities have done well this year, but they are still 30 percent below their highs of 2007. As for the alleged bubble in Treasury bonds, admittedly they have been wonderful long-term havens for many years, foreign holdings are enormous, and issuance will probably average $400 billion a year from now through 2012. However, foreign central banks will buy almost $500 billion this year, and U.S. commercial banks, still loan-shy, continue to pour money into Treasuries, which are decent value with 3.5 percent yield and inflation at 1 to 2 percent. These two "bubbles" are still just pleasingly plump.
While the new normal may satisfy our puritan instinct, I sense something wrong in the equation. It's possible that world growth—fueled by the rising share of world GDP (now 36 percent) derived from the developing economies, or from some surge in new green or energy technologies—will turn out to be far better than what Gross & Co. envision. Stranger things have happened in the past. In 1947 the world seemed very grim indeed, and yet it was on the verge of the greatest boom in history. Warren Buffett recently pointed out that stocks usually did best when the economy was at its worst. On the other hand, it's also conceivable that the new normal is too benign. The doomsayers are right. The global economy double-dips as commercial real estate collapses and banks are crippled. With the authorities having already used most of their stimulus ammunition, there is not much they can do. Unemployment continues to rise, corporate earnings collapse, residential house prices fall again, and stock markets go to new lows with disastrous wealth effects. That worst-case scenario may be worth betting on too. Just don't run with the middling crowd.
Biggs is managing partner of Traxis Partners Hedge Fund in New York.
Find this article at http://www.newsweek.com/id/226496
1 則評論在 Barton Biggs: What New Normal?.
Seeing the different kinds of wine at the dinner gathering was already an eye opener; tasting it was indeed a pallet test, at least to a layman like me. But I must admit that the experience was great. I was indeed trying my utmost to appreciate the attributes of each glass of wine that you graciously offered. For your peace of mind, you did not waste your wine on me. I did sense a different quality in each except that I couldn’t put my comments into proper words. My friend Elzorro compared wines to the different characteristics of women in his reply to my blog. Those analogies probably help in understanding the subtleties of wines. And for that matter, hope I know enough of women.
I had lunch with L at the Peninsular Gaddies yesterday. We had wine over lunch (of course the house wine was nothing to compare with yours). L was very appreciative of your excellent wine collections as well as you enthusiasm and expertise.
Do spare me a glass of wine next time when we dine again. I will behave.
[版主回覆12/16/2009 21:16:00]True that Wine and Woman both start with W.
You would have more fun by having fun with wine. I would too.